Those of us who use Linux on our desktops understand that it is a great desktop OS. In this capacity it is perfectly capable of meeting the needs of most people. There are however, two major factors which prevent it from becoming a viable alternative for average people in the US. Both also represent a certain corruption of the US political system. I'm referring to software patents and the 'Digital Millennium Copyright Act' (DMCA).
People use their computers to browse the web, send and receive email, word processing, catalog and re-touch pictures etc... Linux and the applications included with most distributions are capable of doing these things and doing them well. Today people have come to expect multimedia capabilities with their computers. This is the dilemma which Linux faces in the US. Particularly with commercial DVDs. Not because GNU/Linux apps aren't capable of playing these encrypted discs but because they are prevented from doing so by the DMCA. In particular DeCSS which was created through reverse engineering by Norwegian Jon Johansen. (otherwise known as "DVD Jon")
The DMCA is a bad law which was passed after heavy lobbying by big media and proprietary software companies. The DMCA prevents circumvention of copy-protection and this is why the use of DeCSS is technically illegal in the US. Common sense and a basic idea of right and wrong would dictate that people should be allowed to view legally purchased content. The MPAA doesn't see it this way. Which is why they sought to prosecute Jon Johansen in Norway. After two attempts the judge in the case asserted that since Johansen had legally purchased his DVDs he had a right to watch them even if that required circumvention of the CSS encryption. Johansen was aquitted of all charges.
While other nations are more concerned with consumer protections in some respects, the use of DeCSS in the US remains illegal. To deal with this, Linux distributors in the US do not include DeCSS and do not offer it in their repositories. Although DeCSS can be easily downloaded from repositories outside of the US. Novell goes one step further by purposely crippling xine libraries in openSUSE to prevent the playback of encrypted DVDs even with the DeCSS library installed. Canonical now sells proprietary DVD software for use with Ubuntu. This puts Linux at a disadvantage in that Windows includes this capability. DVD software for windows is also generally included with the purchase of a DVD-ROM.
We must also consider the case of the ubiquitous iPod. OSX and Windows users have the option of installing iTunes. This software doesn't exist for use on Linux. With Linux, iPod compatibility is a moving target. Because of the popularity of the iPod, developers of free music players/managers have worked for iPod compatibility only to see it broken by the next firmware update from the most closed software/hardware company on the planet.
Today, the average consumer expects multimedia capabilities 'out-of-the-box'. (or at least easily obtainable) Today GNU/Linux is artificially handicapped by the DMCA putting the operating system at a disadvantage when compared to other OSs with respect to multimedia capabilities. Of course the freedom of GNU/Linux vastly out weighs this disadvantage but most people are not aware of Free Software's existence nor it's ideals. They just want it to work.
This dilemma is not easily solved in the US. We could push for bad laws such as the DMCA to be changed or repealed, but with powerful, big-money lobbies pressuring Congress this would be an exercise in futility. Another option (and one already taken by some) is to use DeCSS to watch legally purchased content as a matter civil disobedience and fight it out in court if it comes to that. Until this problem is solved, GNU/Linux will not become mainstream. Which brings us to a point of contention for many in the free software community.
Many in the 'community' are not concerned with whether or not Linux becomes 'mainstream'. Some even have an aversion to the idea. Mainstream adoption of Linux is important. With wider adoption comes wider awareness and increased advocacy. This is vital when faced with proprietary vendors who seek to destroy the 'threat' of Free Software by any and all means necessary. (including corruption of our legislative process)
In part 2 we'll discuss software patents...
Greetings, Tim & Dietrich
BTW...May I say nice site....
I normally agree with you (guys) on many/most things...and I agree that there is a perception/availability problem for multi-media, on Linux, specifically commercially encrypted DVDs.
However I do not agree completely with this blogs assessment, and I see it a bit differently.
I am no fan of DMCA and dissagree with it in concept & princepal
But it does allow for some fair use in section 1201(f)... As you purchase/rent limited rights to decrypt to be able to view the content with the DVD.
It is also my understanding, Libdvdcss, which is used in most Linux or apps for CSS encrypted DVDs is different than DeCSS.
Some links that maybe on point?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libdvdcss
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/FreeFormats#head-c2258969400dbf867f84949acc2a276a10e8ae7c
That second link, (when you scroll down to the DVD section, under Specific format / application information) explains it almost in plain English and also points to the specific section of the DMCA.
This is not to say there is not much confusion, FUD, & issues with IP & Commerce.
BTW not really Anonymous, I am having issues signing in....
LazLong.......
Thank you Laz Long..
You are correct. I was confusing DeCSS and libdvdcss.
However no one is sure exactly what the potential consequences are under the DMCA. I'd be willing to bet that the MPAA considers the use of libdvdcss to be 'illegal'. So much so that I believe we will see a lawsuit eventually.
Novell is worried (or pandering) to the extent that they have ship crippled xine libraries (xine-lib vs. libxine) so that neither xine nor kaffine will play encrypted DVDs even with libdvdcss installed.
Of course what freedom is left after the onerous DMCA is now under attack by the "Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement" (ACTA) which is being negotiated with G8 nations in secret. We don't get to see the text. Many have Characterized it as a potential threat even to legal file-sharing. This trade agreement is supported by the MPAA, RIAA, Time Warner, News Corp, Disney, Microsoft, etc... Of course there is no one representing the interests of the people involved in the negotiations.
How do I put this
Yes both Copyrights & Patents are becoming even more complicated and convoluted.
Yet there is no law (yet) that specifically calls out Libdvdcss as illegal. In fact the DMCA (even being bad/unfair law) in section 1201(f) indicates (though not specifically) Libdvdcss is legal to use to view the content.
i.e. DVD playback......
However if used with intent to redistribute, then one is doing something illegal, but that would be no different if using DD or Nero, DVDcopy, Xcopy or a myriad other tools on any system.
It is an artificial issue, use to create a foothold/beachhead & exclusivity for commercial interests, and FUD for the unaware.
Yes IANAL and this is just the way I tend to look at it.
So it bothers me when there seems to be so much mis-information... and little understanding.....
Who cares what the MPAA "considers", they do not make law! And you purchase some rights with the device & media.........
Still having difficulty signing in.
Any suggestions?
LazLong.
Thanks LazLong for your reply.
As far as I can tell, your first attempt to post a comment went to 'pending' in our comments queue. I flipped it to approved.
If you post Anonymously, the comment will not be published until we 'review'. I think I will just change that and see if spam comments ensue.
Otherwise, if you are experiencing difficulty 'registering' a name/password, let me know.
dietrich at dtschmitz.com
I've updated the MT comments policy to immediately approve comments from anyone.
LazLong,
I've determined there was an issue with the smtp 'relayhost' setting in postfix. It has since been corrected and tested by both Tim and myself and verified as working correctly.
If you would please try to register again, the confirmation email you should have received will come through.
Thank you again for your reply and participation.
--Dietrich